Practically Speaking
Kyle and her husband moved to Brookfield in 1986. She became active in local politics and started blogging in 2004. Her focus is primarily on local issues but often includes state and national topics, too. Kyle looks at things from the taxpayers' perspective in a creative, yet down to earth way, addressing them from a practical point of view.
Brookfield's City Clerk & voter registration checks
http://legalnewsline.com/news/216035-judge-oks-van-hollens-lawsuit-against-elections-officials
MADISON, Wis. (Legal Newsline) - Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van
Hollen will be allowed to sue state elections officials to force them
to verify thousands of voters' identities, a judge has ruled.
Van
Hollen, a Republican, is seeking to force the state Government
Accountability Board to confirm the identity of thousands of voters
before the Nov. 4 election by cross checking information on thousands
of voter registrations against information in other state databases.
Democrats claim that the attorney general's lawsuit is a means to suppress the vote.
Van
Hollen filed the lawsuit last week against the state's Government
Accountability Board over claims the board failed to meet the federal
Help America Vote Act of 2002, known as HAVA.
The Government
Accountability Board's attorney,Lester Pines, had argued that Van
Hollen should be disqualified because state Supreme Court rules say
attorneys cannot sue their own clients.
Dane County Circuit
Judge Maryann Sumi on Wednesday disagreed, saying that the attorney
general can sue to force state agencies to adhere to the law.
"Whether
or not the attorney general should be using his authority in this way
is something to be decided at the ballot box when the attorney general
is subject to reelection," Sumi said.
In his lawsuit, Van Hollen
said Wisconsin was required to have a system in place that would meet
federal elections requirements no later than January 1, 2006. However,
the system was not in place until just recently.
The attorney
general said had Wisconsin met the HAVA deadline, new voters who
registered by mail since January 1, 2006, would have been subject to a
so-called "HAVA check" to ensure that the information they provided to
election officials matched the information in other public databases.
"The
goal of this requirement is to protect the integrity of elections by
ensuring that only those who are qualified and properly registered
would be permitted to cast ballots," Van Hollen said, announcing his
lawsuit.


This site uses Facebook comments to make it easier for you to contribute. If you see a comment you would like to flag for spam or abuse, click the "x" in the upper right of it. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use.